The Applicant, a PSU,
entered into an offshore services contract with a Russian company for setting
up a power plant. The Applicant claimed that the income arising to the Russian
company from offshore supply of equipment was not chargeable to tax in India
and that it was not liable to deduct/ bear TDS thereon u/s 195. However, as in
the assessment of the Russian company, the AO had already taken the view that
the income from offshore supply was chargeable to tax u/s 44BBB and the
issue was pending before the Tribunal, the question arose whether the
application was maintainable in view of clause (1) of the Proviso to s. 245R(2)
which provides that an application is not maintainable if the question raised
in it “is already pending before any income-tax authority or Appellate
Tribunal, or any Court.” The Applicant claimed that the pendency in the
case of the recipient did not affect the maintainability in the context of the
payer’s obligation to deduct tax u/s 195. HELD rejecting the application.
No comments:
Post a Comment